|
|
|

|
| |
Arthur Tress.
"Superman Fantasy."
1977
|
|
Arthur
Tress was not a photographer that pandered to the emerging "lifestyle"
cult of gay masculinity that was beginning to formulate towards the
end of the 1970s and the early 1980s. Borrowing elements from both a
'camp' aesthetic and Surrealism, his images from this time parodied
the inner identity of gay men, prodding and poking beneath the surface
of both the gay male psyche and their fantasies. In the above image
Tress conveys the desire of some gay men for the 'ideal' of the superhero,
powerful, with muscular body and large penis. But the desiree has a
'natural' body and it is his penis that projects between the Superman's
thighs. Superman is only a fantasy, a cut out figure with no relief,
and Tress pokes fun at gay men who desire heroic masculine body images
to reinforce their own sense masculinity.
In
Australia, around the same time, there emerged the work of the photographer
Bill Henson. Again, Henson did not use stereotypical masculine body
images. In an early sequence of his work we see a young man who looks
emaciated (almost like a living skeleton) at rest, a moment of stasis
while apparently in the act of masturbating. Here Henson links the sexual
act (although never seen in the photographs) with death. Visually Henson
represents Georges Bataille's idea that the ecstasy of an orgasm is
like the oblivion of death. The body in sex uses power as part of its
attraction and the ultimate expression of power is death; this sequence
of photographs links the two ideas together visually. With the explicit
medical link between sex and death because of the HIV/AIDS virus these
photographs have a powerful resonance within a contemporary social context,
the emaciated body now associated in people's minds with a person dying
from AIDS.
Bill Henson.
"Image No.9 from
an Untitled Sequence."
Silver gelatin photograph.
1977
|
|
|
 |
Other
photographers, notably Bruce Weber, confirmed the constructed 'ideal'
of the commodified masculine body notably with his seminal photo essay
of the American Olympic team that appeared in Interview Magazine in 1981.
These photographs, with a genetic lineage dating from Sansone and the
photographs of sportsmen by German photographer Leni Riefenstahl in the
1930s, are almost utopian in their aesthetic idealisation of the male
body.
The
body in Weber's photographs became his product (in one sense his photographs
of them, in another the team members become product by appearing
in a fashion/lifestlye magazine, a product for the desires of the viewer),
became part of an overall purchased "lifestyle" - chic, beautiful, and
available if you have enough money. Working mainly as a fashion photographer
but with an aspiration to high art, Weber paraded a plethora of stunning
caucasian and black, buff, muscular males before his lens. Advertising
companies such as Calvin Klein swooped on this image of perfect male flesh
and played with the ambiguous homoerotic and homosocial (that is, friendship
between men, supposedly not homosexual) possibilities inherent within
the images. Gay men fell for this epito-me of maleness, a reflection of
their own "straight-acting" masculinity.
|
|
Below:
Bruce Weber.
"Paul Wadina,
Santa Barbara California."
1987
|
Above:
Bruce Weber.
"Dan Harvey,
New York Jets Trainer."
1983 |
|
|
In
his personal work, examples of which can be seen above, Bruce Weber
maintains his interest in the perfection of the male form. These men
are just 'All American Jocks', your everyday American 'boy next door',
possessing no sexuality other than a flaccid non-threatening penis;
no messy secretions or interactions are attached to the bodies at all.
There is no hint of disease or dis-ease among these images or models,
even though AIDS was emerging at this time as a major killer of gay
men. Even the possibility of homo/sexuality/identity is denied in the
perfection of their form placed, like the Mapplethorpe photograph of
Schwarzenegger, against a non-descriptive background, a context-less
body in a context-less photograph.
|